![]() ![]() This coincided with their acquisition of the horse, which allowed them greater mobility in their search for better hunting grounds. The Comanche emerged as a distinct group shortly before 1700, when they broke off from the Shoshone people living along the upper Platte River in Wyoming. The Comanche speak an Uto-Aztecan language, sometimes classified as a Shoshone dialect. ![]() Today, the Comanche Nation consists of 14,105 members (2008 enrollment figures), about half of whom live in Oklahoma (centered at Lawton), and the remainder are concentrated in Texas, California, and New Mexico. There may have been as many as 45,000 Comanches in the late 18th century. Originally, the Comanches were hunter-gatherers, with a typical Plains Indian culture. The Comanche are a Native American ethnic group whose range (the Comancheria) consisted of present-day eastern New Mexico, southern Colorado, northeastern Arizona, southern Kansas, all of Oklahoma, and most of northwest Texas. It must be emphasized that the Kusunda language is not included in this version of the hypothesis.Christianity, Native American Church, Traditional Tribal Religion (Uto-Aztecan Language Family) ![]() Finally, a sketch of the current Dene-Caucasian hypothesis, as offered by the Evolution of Human Language Project (sponsored by the Santa Fe Institute), is outlined, emphasizing lexical and grammatical evidence. Starostin, published in the 1980s and 1990s), and his apparent unawareness of more recent studies published within the last two decades that should have been consulted for the critique. However, I must take issue with Gerber on several counts, such as misapprehension or mischaracterization of the basic texts of the Sino-Caucasian hypothesis (mainly by S.A. This writer, who has been involved with Dene-Caucasian studies since the late 1980s, welcomes the critique and discussion of "Dene-Kusunda" (which I would call an extinct hypothesis) by Pascal Gerber (2017) in this journal. In the modern era since about the 1980s the Dene-Caucasian hypothesis has continued to evolve and be refined through the application of improved methods and more precise linguistic data. Some of these postulations also included Basque, Burushaski, and the Na-Dene family in North America. The Dene-Caucasian (or Sino-Caucasian) hypothesis is a relatively young proposal, though it has deep roots in several earlier theories, as far back as the 1850s, that attempted to genetically connect (North) Caucasian languages with the Yeniseian and/or Sino-Tibetan language families. Of course, the Paleogrammarian work has continued to flourish, the Neogrammarian not so much. A related issue was whether then there was a connection between Tubatulabal lenition of stops and that in the Numic languages, which seems to be impossible. ![]() geminate stops was realized in Tubatulabal as "a short vowel-stop versus long vowel- stop contrast" (this was stated backwards since he actually claimed the reverse), which is not even remotely correct as a general rule-which had anyway been evident for some years. This was a response to one of the leaders of the latter had claimed based on a handful of unrepresentative examples that the PUA contrast of single vs. where we to rather directly confront the Neogrammarian approach that we tried to follow (in agreement with Sapir, Whorf, and Miller) with the Paleogrammarian (following Vovin and Georg we could now call this the mess comparative method) that has dominated the field for decades. This is one of the only two (out of however many) of our articles on the reconstruction of Proto-Uztecan, the sound changes in the various branches, etymologies, subclassification, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |